Bacon and Shakspere by William Henry Burr
Ever looked at a famous painting and wondered if someone else really painted it? That's the exact feeling you get reading William Henry Burr's Bacon and Shakspere. This isn't a new book—it was published in 1857—but the debate it tackles is timeless: who actually wrote the works of Shakespeare?
The Story
There isn't a plot in the traditional sense. Instead, Burr lays out his case like a lawyer. He argues that William Shakespeare of Stratford-upon-Avon, the man we all learn about, didn't have the education, life experience, or access to the courtly knowledge shown in the plays. So, who did? Burr points squarely at Sir Francis Bacon, a towering intellectual of the era. The core of the book is Burr's attempt to prove this by finding secret codes and ciphers within the text of Shakespeare's First Folio. He spends pages showing how counting letters, analyzing word choices, and looking for patterns reveals Bacon's hidden signature. It's a step-by-step guide to what Burr believes is a centuries-old cover-up.
Why You Should Read It
You should read this not because it's definitely right, but because it's incredibly thought-provoking. It's a masterclass in building an unconventional argument. Watching Burr connect dots most people wouldn't even see is mesmerizing. It forces you to question everything you think you know about literary history. The book also offers a snapshot of 19th-century thinking—a time when people were obsessed with secret societies and hidden knowledge. You'll find yourself flipping back and forth, checking his work, and getting totally sucked into the mystery. It’s less about agreeing with the conclusion and more about enjoying the wild ride of the investigation.
Final Verdict
This book is perfect for curious readers who love a good historical puzzle or conspiracy theory. If you enjoy shows about unsolved mysteries or debates about art forgeries, you'll get a kick out of this. It's also great for Shakespeare fans who want to explore the 'authorship question' from a passionate, original source. Just be ready to have your skepticism handy. Approach it like an intriguing piece of historical detective work, not settled fact, and you'll have a blast.
There are no legal restrictions on this material. You are welcome to share this with anyone.
Dorothy Allen
4 months agoThe fonts used are very comfortable for long reading sessions.
John White
1 year agoComprehensive and well-researched.
Joshua Martin
1 year agoBeautifully written.
Richard Williams
4 months agoI stumbled upon this title and the arguments are well-supported by credible references. Worth every second.
Jennifer King
3 months agoI was skeptical at first, but the narrative structure is incredibly compelling. I couldn't put it down.